
It is said that bad coin & lousy politicians seldom go out of circulation. After a brief festival reprieve Bengal is ready to face the body line bouncers from Mamta again.
From 1st November she will start her demands again about the returning of the land to unwilling farmers again. What if the same land is in patches scattered through out the land acquired by left pause.
The said land is no longer fit for agriculture. So what the farmers are going to do with the said land pause, who will determine how much land belongs to unwilling farmers, Mamta of course.
What happened to the proposed defamation suit against Tatas, pause
who will compensate Tatas & vendors for the development, pause. The logic is not far to seek the land in question can only be used for industry.
So either tiny industries have to be set up which will be constantly harassed by the band of brigands or any big industry will have to negotiate with Mamta & whatever compensation /jobs she wants have to be given to her supporters as also to others
but this is what Tata & left were prepared to do.
I am confused what about you? Sara hisaab jyon ka tyon fir bhi kunba duba kyon
I applied the average & got in to the river with my family I wonder why all of them drowned though my arithmetic was correct?
Readers please enlighten
Thanks
GIGO but who put them in.....
well we get the leaders we desrve
I would interested if any one can compare the Land Reforms implementation in Gujarat,Rajasthan, M.P.,Bihar ,U.P. Karnataka and A.P. Vs. West Bengal and Kerala,may be Tripura.
No its not her vicory but WB Govt's defeat. It was never a fight betw Mamta and Tata but between Mamta and wb Govt. Tata had been permiited to set up unit for Nano by govt .WB Govt should have paid the farmers adequately for their lands. Mamta only capitolised on this fact to strengthen her party against CPM. She has no concern about well being of farmers. Tata not being political, did not foresee the politics till it was too late.Had Tata to purchase Mamta alongwith the land, he would not have landed in this mess.
The industry is quite dissatisfied!
Do you know West Bengal ’s land reform legislation does not directly attempt to turn the bargadars into landowners. However, the legislation includes two provisions intended to facilitate that conversion from bargadar to landowner. The legislation gives bargadars priority rights to purchase the barga land if the landlord decides to sell such land.
Local Opinions (8)
and we are the ones stuck in it!
GIGO but who put them in.....
well we get the leaders we desrve
I would interested if any one can compare the Land Reforms implementation in Gujarat,Rajasthan, M.P.,Bihar ,U.P. Karnataka and A.P. Vs. West Bengal and Kerala,may be Tripura.
No its not her vicory but WB Govt's defeat. It was never a fight betw Mamta and Tata but between Mamta and wb Govt. Tata had been permiited to set up unit for Nano by govt .WB Govt should have paid the farmers adequately for their lands. Mamta only capitolised on this fact to strengthen her party against CPM. She has no concern about well being of farmers. Tata not being political, did not foresee the politics till it was too late.Had Tata to purchase Mamta alongwith the land, he would not have landed in this mess.
Do you know West Bengal ’s land reform legislation does not directly attempt to turn the bargadars into landowners. However, the legislation includes two provisions intended to facilitate that conversion from bargadar to landowner. The legislation gives bargadars priority rights to purchase the barga land if the landlord decides to sell such land.
Global Opinions (2)
The industry is quite dissatisfied!
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 












and we are the ones stuck in it!